🚀 go-pugleaf

"neo" <MATREEX@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1180017338.994303.280440@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
| Anybody knows centre of gravity of human brain? As the mass of
| neocortex is 76% of total mass of human brain, center of gravity of
| human brain should be somewhere in neocortex.
|
| I searched web, groups but can't find answer.

Caveat: Everything I will discuss in this post
is from my own work, which has not yet been
accepted by Professionals in Neuroscience.

The "biological mass" that I've been writing
about in my posts in b.n are not completely
the same as 'mass" as the term is used in
Physics.

"Biological mass" is a term I coined to connote
the net microscopic trophic modifications that
occur as a result of the neural activation.

These "micro-mods" [for short] are physically-
real stuff that exerts physically-real inertia
within neural dynamics, including cognition
and everything else to which folks commonly
refer to as "being manifestations of brain
function.

It's in these inertial dynamics that "biological
mass" is exactly analogous to physical "mass",
but the former exerts its inertia within neural
dynamics.

When one "learns" it's be-cause one has
acquired "biological mass" with respect to
that which one has "learned". We send our
Children to school to to have their nervous
system modified through the acquisition of
"biological mass" :-]

When our Children can do 'new' stuff upon
their completion of, say, a term in school,
it's be-cause the "biological mass" they
acquired as a result of the neural activation
that occurred while they were paying-attention
in class is exerting physically-real inertia
'within' their cognitive dynamics [the net
result is dependent upon 'time' spent in
"sleep" 'states, but that's beyond the scope
of this post.]

Both "biological mass" and physical "mass"
reduce to 3D-Energydynamics in the work
I've been discussing in b.n.

But, while one can "weigh" physical mass
on a balance, 'weighing' "biological mass"
happens 'within' nervous systems -- as in
the "weighing" of alternatives, only the
'weighing' literally happens 'within' the
neural Topology.

In the not too distant future, I expect that
"biological mass" will be observable via
external monitoring devices. [I've discussed
a technique, SD-EEG [Simultaneous Diff-
erential Electro EncephloGram] through
which this 'weighing' of "biological mass"
can be crudely achieved [long-former dis-
cussions], and there are a lot of other
already-existing monitoring devices that
can be used in the 'same' way. The im-
portant thing is to render the neural-activ-
ation "differentials" concrete. They correlate
to "biological mass" be-cause "biological
mass" does, in fact, exert its inertia 'within'
neural-activation dynamics.

Anyway, that's the 'difference' between
"biological mass" and physical "mass".

They're pretty-much the same-stuff, but
biological mass requires, and happens
in, nervous systems.

To see the 'same'-ness, one has to work
at the 'level' of the 3D-E to which I referred
above.

There's real usefulness in doing so.

k. p. collins