🚀 go-pugleaf

neo wrote
"|
Center of gravity of any body has information about every atom in
body. You remove some mass from one point and this info regarding
change in mass propagates to center of gravity instantaneously(yeah).

Likewise center of gravity of brain i.e 'self' has info about
functioning of every neuron. If some neuron is damaged, this info
propagates to centre of gravity of brain i.e 'self' or 'consciousness'
instantaneously(yeah, instantaneously).

In physics, how center of gravity is 'aware' of mass is not
understood. Likewise in neuroscience, how our 'consciousness' is
'aware' of functioning of neurons is not understood.

So it is not illogical to compare center of gravity with self or
consciousness.
"
This is all inducable to the theory, or rather the problem of cause and
effect, that like so many a philosophical subject, and not least the
existence of the objective, never got satisfyingly answered or it would have
to be by the evidence of the largish library of theoretical participants
fruitlessly discussing it, in the case of cause and effect located somewhere
in the 17th and 18th century.

No information can ever exist that cannot actually be (re)produced. We can
mathematically establish that even if we would know the exact number of
possible causes, the effect by itself can never be reduced to a single
original configuration of these. So we will always end up with an equasion
with multiple variables which would make for rather thin information.

If we would consider the atom unsplittable, just by looking at a single one,
we may calculate the number of possible causes to its current position as
the total number of atoms in the universe to the power of the total number
of atoms in the universe to the power of 15 billion years of atomic time
units, since things do not happen instanteneously but at the speed of light,
at best. Which is a lot, but not a lot of information. If anything.