🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.astro
Article #4675

Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt

#4675
From: Double-A
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:13
70 lines
4359 bytes
mbbr@mighty.co.za wrote:
> Kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham the "irrelevaant"
> Ignoranus whined and tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
> > Greg Hennessy writes:
> >
> > >>>>>> Astronomers don't need a definition for "planet", and IMO creating one
> > >>>>>> was a big mistake.
> >
> > >>>>> How else are astronomers supposed to answer the question "how many
> > >>>>> planets are there in the solar system?" if we don't have a definition
> > >>>>> of what a planet is?
> >
> > >>>> That question comes from the public, not from astronomers.
> >
> > >>> You erroneously presuppose the question comes from the public, not
> > >>> astronomers.
> >
> > >> Not at all.
> >
> > > Yes at all. The question came from me, and I am an astronomer, so you
> > > were erroneous in your presupposition that the question comes from the
> > > public.
> >
> > You're the first astronomer I've encountered who can't answer the
> > question.
>
> Unlike your "lassic" evasions, eh, Dickless? A0L!!!
>
> > Too bad you're not in a position to answer that question
> > when the public asks it.
>
> Unlike you, eh, Dickless? You're noted for answering all the questions
> put to you.
>
> > >>> It is oxymoronic to assert that a definition isn't needed and that
> > >>> questions can be answered by using a definition.
> >
> > >> Irrelevant, given that no such assertion has been made.
> >
> > > Incorrrect.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> On your part, Dickless.
>
> > > Check the text quoted above.
> >
> > Indeed, do so.  Nowhere does it say that a definition isn't needed.
>
> So you k'lame, Dickless.
>
> > > The assertion that a definition is not need has indeed been made.
> >
> > Incorrect.
>
> "Irrelevaant".
>
> > > I don't know why you make such easily disproved claim.
> >
> > You're erroneously presupposing that the claim can be easily disproved.
>
> On your part, Dickless. Also non sequitur and rather ironic.


Why don't you find someone to pick on who is more at your own
intellecual level, Bruce, another kindergarten drop out like yourself?


Double-A
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1156947206.158886.110470@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <6qOdnbzhftkhc3PZnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@insightbb.com> <1156511118.515497.295070@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <7k0ue2h9mh3c2kh6bfen2dj4o9tqijha2l@4ax.com> <1156548644.036771.299620@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <eco219$qj1$1@praesepe.isi.edu> <9p4ve2pl15gqv8cvfo7n0j5v5efqq7vnrf@4ax.com> <kqf6f2lm8nqt543vr7inargadbkejgmpen@4ax.com> <jsg6f2lbv7kg4sdtc070q9h8q7ad686htv@4ax.com> <hrMIg.18742$YC3.9530@tornado.socal.rr.com> <p957f25nfdv5j0qjl67j68diitt27kebum@4ax.com> <slrnef76m2.9r0.greg.hennessy@localhost.localdomain> <SuSIg.5411$S_5.3287@tornado.socal.rr.com> <slrnef8dev.jok.greg.hennessy@localhost.localdomain> <ypZIg.3242$Cs3.857@tornado.socal.rr.com> <slrnef8rpl.mui.greg.hennessy@localhost.localdomain> <%B_Ig.19560$YC3.13320@tornado.socal.rr.com> <1156926242.023809.166520@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,d5eb98eb23d53fdf
X-Google-Thread: fdc67,fa647a9ea37a3cd1
X-Google-Thread: 1156f6,fa647a9ea37a3cd1
X-Google-Thread: 1138ec,fa647a9ea37a3cd1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,gidfdc67,gid1156f6,gid1138ec,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Double-A" <double-aa@hush.ai>
Newsgroups: sci.astro,alt.astronomy,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject: Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
Date: 30 Aug 2006 07:13:26 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <1156947206.158886.110470@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <6qOdnbzhftkhc3PZnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@insightbb.com>
   <1156511118.515497.295070@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <7k0ue2h9mh3c2kh6bfen2dj4o9tqijha2l@4ax.com>
   <1156548644.036771.299620@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <eco219$qj1$1@praesepe.isi.edu>
   <9p4ve2pl15gqv8cvfo7n0j5v5efqq7vnrf@4ax.com>
   <kqf6f2lm8nqt543vr7inargadbkejgmpen@4ax.com>
   <jsg6f2lbv7kg4sdtc070q9h8q7ad686htv@4ax.com>
   <hrMIg.18742$YC3.9530@tornado.socal.rr.com>
   <p957f25nfdv5j0qjl67j68diitt27kebum@4ax.com>
   <slrnef76m2.9r0.greg.hennessy@localhost.localdomain>
   <SuSIg.5411$S_5.3287@tornado.socal.rr.com>
   <slrnef8dev.jok.greg.hennessy@localhost.localdomain>
   <ypZIg.3242$Cs3.857@tornado.socal.rr.com>
   <slrnef8rpl.mui.greg.hennessy@localhost.localdomain>
   <%B_Ig.19560$YC3.13320@tornado.socal.rr.com>
   <1156926242.023809.166520@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.255.52.72
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1156947211 27174 127.0.0.1 (30 Aug 2006 14:13:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:13:31 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1156926242.023809.166520@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=4.255.52.72;
   posting-account=pb0cmQwAAABwaw9piurfof_6v4NySxNO