🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.astro
Article #4773

Re: pi (was Re: Is lightvelocity accelerating?)

#4773
From: son3776
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 22:34
41 lines
3400 bytes
Thomas S. Zemanian (ts_zemanian@pnl.gov) wrote:

> Allow me to suggest that there really can be no consensus on this issue at
> this point.  "Son" from UT/Dallas is in too deeply now to back down and
> still save face, although it's rapidly becoming clear to me that he is
> mistaken.  I'll try one last attempt, and if this fails to settle the issue
> I recommend we all let this drop.

> If we are to distinguish whether pi be a physical or a mathematical
> constant (or both, as some have recently suggested), we must have some way
> to distinguish the two.  I feel that a physical constant would be one which
> is determined by a measurement, whereas a mathematical constant should drop
> out of a mathematical argument.  This is the gist of the
> circles-on-curved-surfaces arguments that have been batted back and forth.

> Now, we can calculate the value of pi, in theory, to arbitrary precision.
> The precision of a physical measurement, by constructing a huge circle, is
> maximized by making as large a circle as possible and measuring the
> circumference and radius as accurately as possible.  However, given a
> finite universe (I hope we can agree on that, but if not, how about a
> finite region of space accessible to us to build a circle within...) and a
> limit due to quantum uncertainty in how well we can measure the
> circumference and diameter of that circle, we see that we can never measure
> pi as precisely as we can calculate it.  How, then, can pi _possibly_ be a
> physical constant?

> It's just a number.

The fact that we can't measure it to total accuracy does not exclude it
from being a physical constant.

Elementary charge is a physical constant with a computational value of
1.60e-19C and a *best* (1986) value of 1.60217738e-19C with an
uncertainty of .30 parts per million.  Even though we still haven't
measured this to an exact accuracy, we still consider it to be a physical
constant . . . so saying that we can't measure pi to a certain degree of
accuracy does not mean that pi is not a physical constant.


--
"Somewhere else the tea's getting cold." -- The Doctor
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3kkvt7$h5j@utdallas.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!ccsdec1.ufsia.ac.be!reks.uia.ac.be!idefix.CS.kuleuven.ac.be! Belgium.EU.net!EU.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.tamu.edu!news.utdallas.edu!not-for-mail
References: <3jss8u$4gs@utdallas.edu> <cZBu2c6w200w@alcyone.darkside.com> <3kaa63$g5j@utdallas.edu> <ts_zemanian-160395152955@ts_zemanian.pnl.gov>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff8cf,7d15a3c97705a5a5
X-Google-Attributes: gidff8cf,public
X-Google-Thread: f44bc,7d15a3c97705a5a5
X-Google-Attributes: gidf44bc,public
X-Google-Thread: fa827,7d15a3c97705a5a5
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa827,public
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,7d15a3c97705a5a5
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public
X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,7d15a3c97705a5a5
X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-20 17:35:58 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!ccsdec1.ufsia.ac.be!reks.uia.ac.be!idefix.CS.kuleuven.ac.be! Belgium.EU.net!EU.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.tamu.edu!news.utdallas.edu!not-for-mail
From: son3776@utdallas.edu
Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.skeptic,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,swnet.sci.astro,fj.sci.astro
Subject: Re: pi (was Re: Is lightvelocity accelerating?)
Date: 20 Mar 1995 16:34:15 -0600
Organization: The University of Texas at Dallas
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <3kkvt7$h5j@utdallas.edu>
References: <3jss8u$4gs@utdallas.edu> <cZBu2c6w200w@alcyone.darkside.com> <3kaa63$g5j@utdallas.edu> <ts_zemanian-160395152955@ts_zemanian.pnl.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: infoserv.utdallas.edu
NNTP-Posting-User: 5319
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]