🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.astro
Article #3672

Re: astronomers vs researchers (was: Re: research vs commercial grade)

#3672
From: LABBEY
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 00:21
20 lines
1471 bytes
I retract my definition of the word "research."  It was incorrect.

Here is what I meant to say:  Astronomers do not usually use the word
"research" to describe their investigative activities.  They refer to it
as "observing."

While close study can be called research, it is important to realize that
there is a distinction between observational and experimental sciences.
The unfortunate fact is that the word "research" is only used (in astronomy)
by the purveyors of inexpensive telescopes.  The implication that the
subject instrument is of high quality is not necessarily true.  In fact,
the use of the word in advertizing demonstrates that the merchant is not
really familiar with the requirements and practices of astronomers.

Is such a merchant an appropriate source of high-quality instruments?

Leonard Abbey, F.R.A.S.
Georgia Tech Research Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
labbey@gitvm1.gatech.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <93025.192111LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!gitvm1.gatech.edu!labbey
References: <1993Jan20.211839.27984@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <1993Jan21.191712.12358@gov.on.ca> <93022.035547LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET> <1993Jan25.210450.11520@news.lrz-muenchen.de>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!gitvm1.gatech.edu!labbey
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology-Office of Information Technology
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:21:11 EST
From: <LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET>
Message-ID: <93025.192111LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET>
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: astronomers vs researchers (was: Re: research vs commercial grade)
References: <1993Jan20.211839.27984@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
 <1993Jan21.191712.12358@gov.on.ca> <93022.035547LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET>
 <1993Jan25.210450.11520@news.lrz-muenchen.de>
Lines: 20