Article View: sci.astro
Article #3672Re: astronomers vs researchers (was: Re: research vs commercial grade)
From: LABBEY
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 00:21
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 00:21
20 lines
1471 bytes
1471 bytes
I retract my definition of the word "research." It was incorrect. Here is what I meant to say: Astronomers do not usually use the word "research" to describe their investigative activities. They refer to it as "observing." While close study can be called research, it is important to realize that there is a distinction between observational and experimental sciences. The unfortunate fact is that the word "research" is only used (in astronomy) by the purveyors of inexpensive telescopes. The implication that the subject instrument is of high quality is not necessarily true. In fact, the use of the word in advertizing demonstrates that the merchant is not really familiar with the requirements and practices of astronomers. Is such a merchant an appropriate source of high-quality instruments? Leonard Abbey, F.R.A.S. Georgia Tech Research Institute Atlanta, Georgia, USA labbey@gitvm1.gatech.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<93025.192111LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!gitvm1.gatech.edu!labbeyReferences:
<1993Jan20.211839.27984@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <1993Jan21.191712.12358@gov.on.ca> <93022.035547LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET> <1993Jan25.210450.11520@news.lrz-muenchen.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!gitvm1.gatech.edu!labbey Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology-Office of Information Technology Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:21:11 EST From: <LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET> Message-ID: <93025.192111LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET> Newsgroups: sci.astro Subject: Re: astronomers vs researchers (was: Re: research vs commercial grade) References: <1993Jan20.211839.27984@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <1993Jan21.191712.12358@gov.on.ca> <93022.035547LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET> <1993Jan25.210450.11520@news.lrz-muenchen.de> Lines: 20