Thread View: sci.astro
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Jonathan Scott
Thu, 22 Jun 1995 00:00
Re: The Flat Earth? - Conclusion
Author: Jonathan Scott
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 00:00
39 lines
3092 bytes
3092 bytes
In article <3sc148$8nn@netnews.upenn.edu>, on 22 Jun 1995 15:10:00 GMT, Kevin Sterner <sterner@sel.hep.upenn.edu> writes: >In article <3sapbs$nts@dingo.cc.uq.oz.au>, davidcs@psych.psy.uq.oz.au (David Smyth) writes: > >> I just know the physicists are going to tell me what I just said is >> incorrect - and they are right according to General Relativity. The >> pendulum would rotate due to gravitational effects of the rest of the >> rotating universe if the earth was stationary. My apologies to >> the Swami (even if I still think he did fall out of a very tall tree). > >Nope, it can't work that way. You were right the first time. If you were >at the center of a rotating sphere of matter, there would be no force >causing you to begin rotating. No-one said you would begin rotating. What happens is that you observe centrifugal forces and coriolis forces, which means that there is a force outwards from the center, and that things which move in your frame experience extra deflection forces depending on which way round they are going. Of course, one would normally attribute this to having a rotating frame of reference, but the point is that rotation is NOT absolute; it is a locally defined effect which can be simulated by gravitational forces in the same way that acceleration can be simulated, only usually much weaker (since gravitational sources typically move at much less than c). Since it isn't absolute, we can adopt viewpoints where one person's rotation is another's gravitational effect, and it seems plausible (from Mach's ideas) that what we normally define as rotation can be taken to be relative to some sort of average of the whole universe. This means that we can choose to describe the universe taking any point as the center, but it's just somewhat more convenient to choose a point which doesn't have too much acceleration or rotation relative to other local landmarks, as that makes the calculations simpler for the things we can see around us. Jonathan Scott jonathan_scott@vnet.ibm.com or jscott@winvmc.vnet.ibm.com
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads