Article View: sci.bio.botany
Article #143Re: suggestions for deciduous substitution?
From: Pete Selby
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:08
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:08
42 lines
3227 bytes
3227 bytes
I think that this all came about because of the suggestion that planting forests could be a way of overcoming global warming. There is a press release all about it. http://ens.lycos.com/ens/nov2000/2000L-11-09-11.html Two Sections from it are I think significant: 'Relying on forest plantations to store carbon pollution from the atmosphere and combat climate change could accelerate the destruction of old growth native forest around the world, according to a report commissioned by Greenpeace and Worldwide Fund for Nature. ' - Because old growth would be cleared and faster growing species planted instead. 'A second research paper shows that planting new forests will not slow global warming as much as expected. The Kyoto Protocol allows countries to plant forests in order to offset some of their CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels. But forests are generally darker than the underlying terrain, and hence absorb more of the sun's heat. ' "This is particularly true in snowy conditions when grass and soil are covered by snow but trees remain exposed," said the paper. The extra absorption of sunlight causes the world's northern forests to have a warming effect, which would offset part of the cooling effect of CO2 uptake.' 'In some areas of Canada and Siberia, the paper suggests this warming effect is actually greater than the relative cooling afforded by CO2 uptake. Planting forests in these areas would therefore increase warming rather than decrease it as intended. ' "Natural forests are key for maintaining biodiversity and rainfall patterns, but in colder regions, growing new forests may not be as useful as expected for reducing climate warming," said the author Dr. Richard Betts. "In some areas it could even be counterproductive." Note that this was all anounced before the conference in the Hague, at which very little was achieved. My perception is that this was due to intransigence by the USA delegates in still insisting that all would be well if they just planted forests. Pete Selby Southampton UK
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3A60C3C0.7869770E@cwcom.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!falcon.america.net!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!news1.ebone.net!news.ebone.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!news-hub.cableinet.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!peernews!peer.cwci.net!news1-hme0.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<93msl3$hdm@llama.swcp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10bcbe,d7589bcf85b48eb3 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bcbe,public X-Google-Thread: 106b31,d7589bcf85b48eb3 X-Google-Attributes: gid106b31,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-13 13:07:58 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!falcon.america.net!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!news1.ebone.net!news.ebone.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!news-hub.cableinet.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!peernews!peer.cwci.net!news1-hme0.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3A60C3C0.7869770E@cwcom.net> From: Pete Selby <pete.selby@cwcom.net> Reply-To: pete.selby@cwcom.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.bio.botany,bionet.agroforestry Subject: Re: suggestions for deciduous substitution? References: <93msl3$hdm@llama.swcp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 44 Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:08:16 +0000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.44.203.83 X-Trace: news1-hme0 979419885 195.44.203.83 (Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:04:45 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:04:45 GMT