🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.bio.botany
Article #327

Re: A new botany?

#327
From: JAD
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 00:00
18 lines
1272 bytes
David Brear wrote:

> Dr Mark Chase of Kew, Kare Bremer of the University of
> Uppsala in Sweden and Peter Stevens of Harvard have
> investigated the genetic links of plants. The work 'involved the
> detailed comparison of three genes for each of 565
> representatives of all the families of flowering
> plants.'
>
> Maybe this is old news to many readers but what do you think?

3 genes and 565 species? Isn't it a little far fetched to talk about a
whole new systematics on such a meagre basis? I mean - how many
genes are there, all in all? And how many species? Even if the genes
were of fundamental importance, the statistics of what is suggested
here is too weak.

/jan
Technical Details
Message-ID: <365AC191.A4A517C@dannet.dk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <gPS1GDAmedW2EwED@wharfe.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 115fe3,efd2f0909246a78d
X-Google-Attributes: gid115fe3,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bcbe,efd2f0909246a78d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bcbe,public
From: JAD <JAD@dannet.dk>
Subject: Re: A new botany?
Date: 1998/11/24
Message-ID: <365AC191.A4A517C@dannet.dk>
X-Deja-AN: 415172695
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <gPS1GDAmedW2EwED@wharfe.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Customer at Tele Danmark Erhverv
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.bio.botany,bionet.plants