Re: Good U.S. University Botany Programs?

Article View: sci.bio.botany

Article #416

#416

From: Willaim H. Reid
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00

10 lines
968 bytes

> On Wed, 10 Jan 1996, Shawn Lynn wrote:
> 
> <snip> the
> > comparatively unglamourous field of botany?
> > 
All my opinios are subjective, but those in botany don't feel it's
unglamourous--nor do most people in Europe where it is highly
respected. I'd say: U. C. Berkely and Davis. Also U. Texas (Austin)
and U. Colorado (Boulder). 
Bill Reid.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <wh_reid-1801960734490001@wh_reid.pnl.gov>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <30f314cc.0@news.provo.novell.com> <Pine.PTX.3.91j.960117214317.7502B-100000@carson.u.washington.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 115fe3,8c1298919a17ffd4
X-Google-Attributes: gid115fe3,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bcbe,8c1298919a17ffd4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bcbe,public
From: wh_reid@ccmail.pnl.gov (Willaim H. Reid)
Subject: Re: Good U.S. University Botany Programs?
Date: 1996/01/18
Message-ID: <wh_reid-1801960734490001@wh_reid.pnl.gov>
X-Deja-AN: 136040141
references: <30f314cc.0@news.provo.novell.com> <Pine.PTX.3.91j.960117214317.7502B-100000@carson.u.washington.edu>
organization: Terrestrial Ecology, EESC, Battelle PNL
newsgroups: sci.bio.botany,bionet.plants

Reply to Parent Message