Article View: sci.bio
Article #1254Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
From: Milton Tinkoff
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 1990 00:07
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 1990 00:07
22 lines
1658 bytes
1658 bytes
In article <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> reiser@pmafire.UUCP (Steve Reiser) writes: >Without cultural training would human being by there biological nature >be monogamous or is it culturally ingrained from childhood? I think it is culturally ingrained. Men can impregnate as many fertile women as they can have sex with. This allows men to 'spread their DNA around' as much as they can. Women, on the other hand can only bear one child at a time. Therefore it is evolutionarily(?) advantageous for a man not to be monogamous. In fact, I'll go as far to say that it's even better if you can impregnate someone else's woman, because then another man is helping your DNA to survive. Now before anybody starts flaming me, rest assured that I believe in monogamy and I don't think women are property. I guess I'm really applying the above paragraph to the times way back when it was not easy to survive (Neanderthal period, etc.). -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Milt Tinkoff | "The average man is a Silicon Graphics Inc. | stupid man." milt@waynes-world.esd.sgi.com | -Ed Mao
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Oct26.000754.24765@odin.corp.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!sgi!shinobu!odin!miltReferences:
<1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> <15490@netcom.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!sgi!shinobu!odin!milt From: milt@sgi.com (Milton Tinkoff) Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous? Message-ID: <1990Oct26.000754.24765@odin.corp.sgi.com> Date: 26 Oct 90 00:07:54 GMT References: <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> <15490@netcom.UUCP> Sender: news@odin.corp.sgi.com (Net News) Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA Lines: 22