Article View: sci.bio
Article #1296Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
From: Walter Pohl
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 1990 23:31
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 1990 23:31
22 lines
1513 bytes
1513 bytes
In article <58695@microsoft.UUCP> rodvan@microsoft.UUCP (Rod VAN MECHELEN) writes: [...] > >Insofar as gender in language is concerned, when I want to "de-sex" it, >I usually refer to both genders: women and men. Otherwise, I speak from >my own gender (as I have heard female commentators speaking from theirs). >If someone gets upset over a woman or man speaking from their own gender, >then let them whine. Rational people have better things to do. The original article said something like "is man naturally polygamous?" After reading that sentence, I wasn't sure whether or not the author was referring to men, or to all people. I mean, it's possible that men may be naturally polygamous and women aren't, or vice versa. So the usage was in fact ambiguous. Oh, if only I could reach the level of rationality that you have already acheived. Walt Pohl "alt.walt? It has a certain ring to it, no?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Nov1.233150.31363@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!wp6References:
<1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> <1990Oct25.140829.19268@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <58695@microsoft.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!wp6 From: wp6@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Walter Pohl) Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous? Message-ID: <1990Nov1.233150.31363@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 1 Nov 90 23:31:50 GMT References: <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> <1990Oct25.140829.19268@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <58695@microsoft.UUCP> Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News) Organization: Columbia University Lines: 22