Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?

Article View: sci.bio

Article #1383

#1383

From: Eli
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 1990 19:40

9 lines
1024 bytes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Volumes of articles re: above  
>
>I for one do not quite understand all the hubbub... for me , centuries of 
>spontaneous non-monagamous behavior is enough to convince me that we are 
>** NOT  **  naturally monogamous, and that monogamy where it exists is 
>largely a culturally-imposed phenomenon.  Apologies if this seems too 
>simplistic to Netters at large... :-)
	
	I agree with this person totally.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Nov15.194025.27299@ariel.unm.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!ogicse!unmvax!ariel.unm.edu!leo.unm.edu!eellis

References: <58975@microsoft.UUCP> <1990Nov14.005513.28667@massey.ac.nz> <1990Nov15.141028.25126@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!ogicse!unmvax!ariel.unm.edu!leo.unm.edu!eellis
From: eellis@leo.unm.edu (Eli)
Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
Message-ID: <1990Nov15.194025.27299@ariel.unm.edu>
Date: 15 Nov 90 19:40:25 GMT
References: <58975@microsoft.UUCP> <1990Nov14.005513.28667@massey.ac.nz> <1990Nov15.141028.25126@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>
Sender: news@ariel.unm.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message