Article View: sci.bio
Article #1393Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
From: Kenn Barry
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 1990 05:43
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 1990 05:43
20 lines
1508 bytes
1508 bytes
In article <1990Nov16.203058.7780@ariel.unm.edu> bevans@gauss.unm.edu (Mathemagician) writes: >For me, centuries of spontaneous monogamous behaviour is enough to >convince me that SOME of us ARE naturally monogamous and that >promiscuity, where it exists in SOME, is largely a culturally >imposed phenomenon. This doesn't make sense. In cultures where polygamy has been sanctioned, it has also been practised by those who could afford it. In cultures like our own, where monogamy is considered the ideal, it is given only lip service by over half the population. A zoologist studying some other species with mating habits identical to our own would not describe them as "monogamous", I'm sure. We tend to both change partners, and "cheat" on those we have. There's really no point I can see in worrying about this sociobiology crap, anyway. If you're sure what's natural for *you*, why worry about species and instinct? If you feel monogamous, be monogamous; if not, don't. Kayembee
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16984@netcom.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!amdahl!netcom!barryReferences:
<1990Nov15.141028.25126@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> <1990Nov15.194025.27299@ariel.unm.edu> <1990Nov16.203058.7780@ariel.unm.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!amdahl!netcom!barry
From: barry@netcom.UUCP (Kenn Barry)
Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
Message-ID: <16984@netcom.UUCP>
Date: 17 Nov 90 05:43:30 GMT
References: <1990Nov15.141028.25126@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> <1990Nov15.194025.27299@ariel.unm.edu> <1990Nov16.203058.7780@ariel.unm.edu>
Organization: Netcom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 241-9760 guest}
Lines: 20