Article View: sci.bio
Article #1435Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
From: Milton Tinkoff
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 1990 02:07
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 1990 02:07
33 lines
2654 bytes
2654 bytes
In article <1990Nov22.191009.20772@watserv1.waterloo.edu> alternat@watserv1.waterloo.edu (Ann Hodgins) writes: >In article <4836@lure.latrobe.edu.au> ECSGRT@lure.latrobe.edu.au (Geoffrey Tobin, Electronic Engineering) writes: >>In article <1990Oct26.000754.24765@odin.corp.sgi.com>, milt@sgi.com (Milton Tinkoff) writes: >>> In article <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> reiser@pmafire.UUCP (Steve Reiser) writes: >>>>Without cultural training would human being by there biological nature >>>>be monogamous or is it culturally ingrained from childhood? >>> >>> I think it is culturally ingrained. Men can impregnate as many fertile >>> women as they can have sex with. This allows men to 'spread their DNA >>> around' as much as they can. Women, on the other hand can only bear one >>> child at a time. Therefore it is evolutionarily(?) advantageous for a >>> man not to be monogamous. > >Yes but... >if a man 'spreads his DNA around' and all his chidren die, that is a >losing strategy. In nature, if a man stays with a woman at least as long >as she needs his help, that will greatly increase the chances that his >will child will live and live to reproduce. I think I was a bit unclear. If a man stays with one woman then his children by her will be protected, fed, etc. This happens whether he's impregnated any other women or not. Therefore the more women he impregnates, the more possible children will survive. It's even better if the women are already with other men. So now the first man's children are being cared for by other men who believe that the children are their own. So it is advantageous for men to be polygamous as long as their own live-in partner is not. Again, let me stress that all this is in theory. I personally wouldn't want to live in such a society given the choice. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Milt Tinkoff | "The average man is a Silicon Graphics Inc. | stupid man." milt@waynes-world.esd.sgi.com | -Ed Mao
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Nov25.020721.23097@odin.corp.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!sgi!shinobu!odin!miltReferences:
<1990Oct26.000754.24765@odin.corp.sgi.com> <4836@lure.latrobe.edu.au> <1990Nov22.191009.20772@watserv1.waterloo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!sgi!shinobu!odin!milt From: milt@sgi.com (Milton Tinkoff) Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous? Message-ID: <1990Nov25.020721.23097@odin.corp.sgi.com> Date: 25 Nov 90 02:07:21 GMT References: <1990Oct26.000754.24765@odin.corp.sgi.com> <4836@lure.latrobe.edu.au> <1990Nov22.191009.20772@watserv1.waterloo.edu> Sender: news@odin.corp.sgi.com (Net News) Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA Lines: 33