Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?

Article View: sci.bio

Article #1479

#1479

From: Russell Turpin
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 1990 22:27

16 lines
1245 bytes

-----
In article <1990Nov29.201215.14890@uncecs.edu> bch@uncecs.edu (Byron C. Howes) writes:
> Having come of age in the '60s myself, I never actually witnessed this
> phenomenon.  I did, however, see an emphasis on the more, um, spectacular
> features of relationships (like sex, living together) and the expense of
> the more delicate and important emotional components.  Somewhere in there
> we got sex all mixed up with love, and I'm not sure they've been unscrambled
> since.

Do you think there was ever a time when they were unscrambled?!

If you think that sex and love have been scrambled together only
since the 1960s, then you need to start reading more books that
were written more than a century ago.

Russell

Technical Details

Message-ID: <15243@cs.utexas.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!turpin

References: <5869@crash.cts.com> <1990Nov29.180827.10813@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <1990Nov29.201215.14890@uncecs.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!turpin
From: turpin@cs.utexas.edu (Russell Turpin)
Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
Summary: Sex and lover were always mixed up.
Message-ID: <15243@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 29 Nov 90 22:27:33 GMT
References: <5869@crash.cts.com> <1990Nov29.180827.10813@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <1990Nov29.201215.14890@uncecs.edu>
Followup-To: sci.bio
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message