🚀 go-pugleaf

     Hmmmm.  I don't think I agree with the turn this discussion has
taken.  I recall spending some time visiting in a sexual dependency
clinic and the people there sure weren't happy. . . it made me wonder
about sexuality and whether or not monogamy made one healthier.
     Well, I didn't get an answer, but it does seem that IF humans are
'naturally' monogamous, it would seem that these people had paid the 
price for going against their nature. . . but, well, all of them had other
problems.
     The point is, something being 'natural' does not mean that it ALWAYS
happens. . . I am 'naturally' right handed, yet I can change to being left
handed with a great deal of work and trouble.  (I admit, though, that I 
have never remained left handed for long so I don't know if it gets easy)
Why could it not hold the same for other possibly inborn behaviors? 
    (ie I don't think that humans are not naturally monogamous because 
they aren't monogamous. . . I think that one would have to find a large
incidence of happy polygamy to prove that they aren't)
                 Crazyman