Article View: sci.bio
Article #1552Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
From: Mara Chibnik
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 1990 13:38
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 1990 13:38
43 lines
2491 bytes
2491 bytes
In article <6128@crash.cts.com> rcf@pnet01.cts.com (Bob Forsythe) writes:
In an article for which I've lost the reference,
gazit@duke.cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit) asked:
>What difference does it make if gay are born this way,
>or they are made this way, or they choose to be this way?
And, in article <6128@crash.cts.com> rcf@pnet01.cts.com (Bob Forsythe)
responds:
> The difference, Hillel, is that once someone decides they are
>made and not born, it's a much shorter step to deciding that they
>can change if they "really want to", and the person deciding begins
>coming up with tactics to *make* them want to. In the case of
>handedness, this belief led teachers to beat my grandmother and
>mother's hands, tie their left-hands behind them, and generally
>make them ashamed of what they were. In my case it was more
>subtle. Just a teacher proudly announcing she'd never give an
>"A" in handwriting to a left-handed person because we slanted
>our letters the "wrong" way, and determinedly holding my wrist
>down so I couldn't hook my hand when writing, then belittling
>me when I smeared ink across the page. And all because of a
>belief that we could be right-handed "if we really wanted to".
Well, I think you're both right.
The real problem that Bob brings up is *not* the belief that handedness
is a matter of choice and subject to change; the problem-- the _evil_
if you will, is the belief that handedness ought to be made to conform
to a standard and that no liberty is to be permitted a person to write
as befits that person's style.
It's easier to argue against submitting to that kind of control if you
permit yourself to argue that it wasn't a matter of choice, but I
believe that a person who has equal facility to write with either hand
ought to be permitted the choice of which one to use-- or of which to
use when.
No?
--
mara@dorsai.com cmcl2!panix!mara
Mara Chibnik
Life is too important to be taken seriously.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Dec7.133845.9204@panix.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!rochester!rutgers!cmcl2!panix!maraReferences:
<6128@crash.cts.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!rochester!rutgers!cmcl2!panix!mara From: mara@panix.uucp (Mara Chibnik) Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.singles Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous? Message-ID: <1990Dec7.133845.9204@panix.uucp> Date: 7 Dec 90 13:38:45 GMT References: <6128@crash.cts.com> Organization: (hah!) Lines: 43