Re: We've got Eve. Now what about Adam?

Article View: sci.bio

Article #1574

#1574

From: David M. Davis - Public Safety
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 1990 06:10

6 lines
835 bytes

   I recall reading about a problem with this study. I can't recall what the
problem was. If it was in the analysis or in the data but there was a 
problem. It is an interesting theory, (I saw the NOVA that talked about it.)

davisd@ucs.orst.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <22079@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!orstcs!beasley!davisd

References: <15461@cs.utexas.edu> <0bLsVz600Vpb0ftUp_@andrew.cmu.edu> <15566@cs.utexas.edu> <1110@ai.cs.utexas.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!orstcs!beasley!davisd
From: davisd@beasley.CS.ORST.EDU (David M. Davis - Public Safety)
Newsgroups: sci.bio
Subject: Re: We've got Eve.  Now what about Adam?
Message-ID: <22079@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>
Date: 11 Dec 90 06:10:48 GMT
References: <15461@cs.utexas.edu> <0bLsVz600Vpb0ftUp_@andrew.cmu.edu> <15566@cs.utexas.edu> <1110@ai.cs.utexas.edu>
Sender: usenet@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU
Reply-To: davisd@beasley.UUCP (David M. Davis - Public Safety)
Organization: Oregon State University -- UCS
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message