Article View: sci.bio
Article #1577Re: We've got Eve. Now what about Adam?
From: sbishop
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 1990 15:56
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 1990 15:56
14 lines
1372 bytes
1372 bytes
In article <22079@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>, davisd@beasley.CS.ORST.EDU (David M. Davis - Public Safety) writes: > > I recall reading about a problem with this study. I can't recall what the > problem was. If it was in the analysis or in the data but there was a > problem. It is an interesting theory, (I saw the NOVA that talked about it.) > > davisd@ucs.orst.edu The best book on the topic is _The Search for Eve_. It covers all the arguments on the subject very well. BTW, the main complaint is that using The Eve Theory, all other lines of humans around the world at that time are considered to have gone extinct. This doesn't do well with the 'bone' scientists since they see a definite pattern with the fossil bones through out that period and later on as to inheritance of certain characteristics.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Dec11.105612.2009@desire.wright.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uoft02.utoledo.edu!desire.wright.edu!sbishopReferences:
<15461@cs.utexas.edu> <0bLsVz600Vpb0ftUp_@andrew.cmu.edu> <15566@cs.utexas.edu> <1110@ai.cs.utexas.edu> <22079@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uoft02.utoledo.edu!desire.wright.edu!sbishop From: sbishop@desire.wright.edu Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: We've got Eve. Now what about Adam? Message-ID: <1990Dec11.105612.2009@desire.wright.edu> Date: 11 Dec 90 15:56:12 GMT References: <15461@cs.utexas.edu> <0bLsVz600Vpb0ftUp_@andrew.cmu.edu> <15566@cs.utexas.edu> <1110@ai.cs.utexas.edu> <22079@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> Organization: University Computing Services, Wright State University Lines: 14