Article View: sci.bio
Article #2727Re: MRNA
From: Edwin Barkdoll
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 12:16
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 12:16
28 lines
1589 bytes
1589 bytes
In article <1759@tdat.teradata.COM> swf@tools3teradata.com (Stan Friesen) writes: >In article <104941@netnews.upenn.edu>, rowe@pender.ee.upenn.edu (Mickey Rowe) writes: >|> >The brain statement is based on the fact that neurons have less DNA per >|> >unit weight than other kinds of cells (eggs-cluding eggs and who knows what >|> >other special cases). >|> >|> I suspect that this is generally untrue. > >Ah, but it is in fact exactly literally true! All cells in a single body have >the *same* amount of DNA (with a few wierd exception like the polytene >chromosomes in the salivary glands of Drosophila). > >Now, since neurons are amoung the largest cells in the body, Neurons are also among the _smallest_ cells in the in the body -- granule cells of the cerebellum. Granule cells have been estimated to number ~10^11 which I think Mickey pointed out is about that estimated in the rest of the brain. >except for certain muscle fibers and (as mentioned above) eggs, they must >clearly have less DNA per unit weight than other cells. So this ~50% of the neurons - the granule cells - clearly has MORE DNA per unit weight than other cells. -- Edwin Barkdoll eb3@world.std.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C17E3y.GCE@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!mv!world!eb3References:
<C0M7pv.2B1@iat.holonet.net> <104941@netnews.upenn.edu> <1759@tdat.teradata.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.bio Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!mv!world!eb3 From: eb3@world.std.com (Edwin Barkdoll) Subject: Re: MRNA Message-ID: <C17E3y.GCE@world.std.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA References: <C0M7pv.2B1@iat.holonet.net> <104941@netnews.upenn.edu> <1759@tdat.teradata.COM> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 12:16:45 GMT Lines: 28