Re: family of Drosophila spp.

Article View: sci.bio

Article #2751

#2751

From: Stan Friesen
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 18:20

12 lines
941 bytes

In article <1993Jan15.173428.444@aurora.com>, isaak@aurora.com (Mark Isaak) writes:
|> If they're going into so much detail, then why didn't they include
|> "Schizophora/Acalyptratae/Ephydroidea/Drosophilidae" between Cyclorrhapha
|> and Drosophila?  (There's probably a subfamily which could be added as
|> well, but I don't know it offhand.)

If there is the rules require it to be Drosophilinae.

-- 
sarima@teradata.com			(formerly tdatirv!sarima)
  or
Stanley.Friesen@ElSegundoCA.ncr.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1767@tdat.teradata.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tdat!tools3!swf

References: <30052@castle.ed.ac.uk> <robison1.726814887@husc.harvard.edu> <1993Jan15.173428.444@aurora.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tdat!tools3!swf
From: swf@tools3teradata.com (Stan Friesen)
Newsgroups: sci.bio
Subject: Re: family of Drosophila spp.
Message-ID: <1767@tdat.teradata.COM>
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:20:39 GMT
References: <30052@castle.ed.ac.uk> <robison1.726814887@husc.harvard.edu> <1993Jan15.173428.444@aurora.com>
Sender: news@tdat.teradata.COM
Distribution: world
Organization: NCR Teradata Database Business Unit
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message