Article View: sci.bio
Article #4608Re: Ethics in research question
From: Christopher R. Dunlea
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 16:16
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 16:16
16 lines
1502 bytes
1502 bytes
Wow, that sounds REAL hypothetical...but anyway, my opinion is that it is both unprofessional and unethical. And probably business as usual, too. Unfortunately you can prove nothing in court (dates, simlarity of projects, etc) and obviously "collaborated" to some degree, which their attorney would grind you with. My question to you is: why did your hypothetical advisor not check (or, actually, know) the reputation of the Rockefeller lab in the first place? Seems that the research community in your field would be small enough so that word would get around. Chris
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Aug17.121646.21503@newstand.syr.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!psinntp!newstand.syr.edu!rodan.syr.edu!crdunleaReferences:
<1993Aug15.094539.26317@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107c0a,42a5207b19be5fb3 X-Google-Attributes: gid107c0a,public X-Google-Thread: fbe8c,42a5207b19be5fb3 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe8c,public X-Google-Thread: 1061be,42a5207b19be5fb3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1061be,public X-Google-Thread: 1119a6,42a5207b19be5fb3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1119a6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-08-17 10:40:33 PST Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.research,alt.grad-student.tenured,bionet.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!psinntp!newstand.syr.edu!rodan.syr.edu!crdunlea From: crdunlea@rodan.syr.edu (Christopher R. Dunlea) Subject: Re: Ethics in research question Message-ID: <1993Aug17.121646.21503@newstand.syr.edu> Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY References: <1993Aug15.094539.26317@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 12:16:46 EDT Lines: 17