🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <C4LAow.7zw@csulb.edu> sichermn@csulb.edu (Jeff Sicherman) writes:
>In article <26MAR199313552586@cc.utah.edu> djs1539@cc.utah.edu (SEGAL, DAVID JAY) writes:
>>What's the big deal?  There are hundreds of committees in Washington.  Most
>>people don't know who's on them; most people don't care.  Why don't you
>>wait to see what they come up with and spend your energy evaluating that?
>>Isn't the message more important than the messenger?  
>>Besides,
>>I don't understand why people are so focused on the publicity of this
>>particular committee's meetings.  I think the only ones who really have
>>a problem with it are the MD types, who stand the most to lose from 
>>health care reform.  For guys like me, who have the most to gain from
>>reform, I say get off their backs.  

Why in the world do you think that having a bunch of socialists destroy the
health care system will benefit you?  If you want that kind of economy,
go live in the USSR...oops, they can't stand socialism and are changing.
Well, go live in CHina then...ummm, well, I guess they are busting their
butts to abandon socialism too.  Well, Cuba, yeah, Cuba.  You'll be able to
have socialism there for at least a few more years.

>>Finally somebody's actually doing
>>something.  Almost anything is better than the system we've got now.
>>Besides, the committee can't pass any legislation by itself anyway.

>  Also note that these whiners were nowhere to be found when Danny's
>Cabal on Competitiveness held its secret meetings to overturn
>regulations which had been arrived at through the open proposal
>and comment process.

Perhaps it is that Quayle's cabal was trying (for the most part) to protect
people's rights, while Hillary's Cabal is fundamentally dedicated to violating
them.  

--Brian