Article View: sci.bio
Article #4660Re: Hillary Rodham Clinton's Sovietology Exercise
From: Bernie Cosell
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1993 22:42
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1993 22:42
39 lines
3598 bytes
3598 bytes
In article <1993Mar27.012953.4607@oracle.us.oracle.com>, Michael Friedman (mfriedma@us.oracle.com) wrote: } In article <1ot5vgINN28i@gap.caltech.edu> kloomis@cco.caltech.edu (Kate E. Loomis) writes: } >Regarding the extensive list of names on the "top secret, Soviet-Style } >health reform task force" : there is no analogy here. These people are } >not creating policy, they are _drafting a plan_ . ... } >So what is the problem? } The problem is that we are supposed to have an open government. Plans } that do not require security are not supposed to be drafted in secret } by people whose names are not even released. } If nothing else, people who object to the makeup of the task force } have the right to know who is on it and to present their objections to } the people of the United States. I don't understand this. By and large, NONE of the government 'plan making' machinery is particularly open. The gov't *IS* open: by and large they are bound to public disclosure before enacting almost anything. But before that public disclosure, the zillions of agencies, committees, boards, administrations, etc, mostly follow their own courses to decide *what* to propose. In fact, usually you don't even *know* that a particular gov't group is _going_ to propose something until the public notice appears, and the question of *how* they decided to propose what they did is irrelevant and moot. And in any event, why should the makeup of the committee be of any real concern? Either you like the plan or you don't, what difference does it make whether it was drafted by Rush Limbaugh or Lawrence Tribe? Make *SURE* your opinion is heard by your representatives, *LOUD*AND*CLEAR*, but make sure that your focus is on the *plan*, and not on the planners. [what would you do, write to your Congressman to say "This is a _great_ plan, but I don't want it supported because not enough Republicans helped think it up"?] /Bernie\ -- Bernie Cosell cosell@world.std.com Fantasy Farm Fibers, Pearisburg, VA (703) 921-2358
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C4MF3C.BDH@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!world!cosellReferences:
<1993Mar27.012953.4607@oracle.us.oracle.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11485c,d655cdbd90df86f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid11485c,public X-Google-Thread: 107c0a,d655cdbd90df86f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid107c0a,public X-Google-Thread: f54fa,d655cdbd90df86f7 X-Google-Attributes: gidf54fa,public X-Google-Thread: 105b48,d655cdbd90df86f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid105b48,public X-Google-Thread: 10c3c1,d655cdbd90df86f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c3c1,public X-Google-Thread: 104158,d655cdbd90df86f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid104158,public X-Google-Thread: f9d1e,d655cdbd90df86f7 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 1119a6,d655cdbd90df86f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid1119a6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-28 16:48:37 PST Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.med,sci.engr.biomed,talk.politics.drugs,talk.politics.medicine,talk.politics.misc,bionet.general,bionet.sci-resources,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.economics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!world!cosell From: cosell@world.std.com (Bernie Cosell) Subject: Re: Hillary Rodham Clinton's Sovietology Exercise Message-ID: <C4MF3C.BDH@world.std.com> Followup-To: sci.bio,sci.med,sci.engr.biomed,talk.politics.drugs,talk.politics.medicine,talk.politics.misc,bionet.general,bionet.sci-resources,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.economics Organization: Fantasy Farm, Pearisburg, VA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] References: <1993Mar27.012953.4607@oracle.us.oracle.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1993 22:42:48 GMT Lines: 39