🚀 go-pugleaf

pete@basser.oz (Peter Merel) writes:
>In article <1902@moondance.cs.uq.oz> ant@batserver.cs.uq.oz writes:
>>I know that just about every woman who has ever experienced it is going to
>>beleive different, but it really could just be put down to the "Mind over
>>Matter" arguement. That is, if they beleive it's there, it'll be there.
>Clever Hans, where are you when we need you? Seriously, I doubt this. Think -
>if someone told you your navel was the source of dynamite orgasms, would that
>induce such orgasms from navel stimulation?
Yes, but the point is, which are you more likely to believe.  If the person you
tried to convince was niave enough, then quite possibly you could get them to
orgasm just by playing with their navel ;-}

HANG ON, isn't the navel one of the (GOD knows how many) errogenous zones ?
If so, then it really depends on exactly how the person feels about you.  You
may not even have to try to convince her that her navel is going to stimulate
her to such an extent.

>....
> Lot's of abstracts from articles of interest.
>....
Unfortunately I am not prepared to spend the time that you have looking for
articles to the contrary.  I think however I could find an equally convincing
array of articles denying the existance of the G-Spot.  It is the same with
anything that is not completely understood in science I suppose.

I may have a look arround for such articles after this semesters completion.

ant

| \o/        Anthony Murdoch             ant@batserver.cs.uq.oz
| -O- ant    Dept of Computer Science    "It's great to be young and insane"
| /0\        University of Queensland     - Dream Team