Re: Vertebrate growth & evolution

Article View: sci.bio

Article #518

#518

From: Alexander Bernard Brands
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1989 20:55

12 lines
804 bytes

>If true, would this hypothesis support the contention that
>birds (and therefore dinosaurs) are more closely related to
>the mammals than to the reptiles?

        I'm not sure that I follow your reasoning.  Are you saying that
Dinosaurs 
stopped growing when they reached maturity?  I've never heard that before, but 

if there is evidence to support that, I would like to hear about it.

      -Alex

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MZO6H0u00Ws9A6TERS@andrew.cmu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!ab3n+

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!ab3n+
From: ab3n+@andrew.cmu.edu (Alexander Bernard Brands)
Newsgroups: sci.bio
Subject: Re: Vertebrate growth & evolution
Message-ID: <MZO6H0u00Ws9A6TERS@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 20 Nov 89 20:55:28 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 12