🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <25773343.1707@rpi.edu>, jdh@pawl.rpi.edu (Joseph Herrenkohl) writes:
> The  symbol omega refers to the position of a double bond in unsaturated
> fatty acids. Usually the numbering scheme is based on the carboxyl group
> and the position(s) of the double bond(s) are indicated by the superscript
> delta. However an alternative (archaic?) scheme numbers from the terminal
> methyl carbon - the position is then indicated by omega. For example,
> linoleic acid is (delta)9,12-octadecadienoic acid or (omega)6,9-
> octadecadienoic acid.

	Oh, great - another scheme for chemical nomenclature. :-)

	Pardon me for a moment while I air a pet gripe.  As far as I know,
fatty acids haven't changed in the past 20 years since I've been out of
college - so why should the nomenclature change?

	As I learned it, linoleic acid was alternatively referred to by the
designation 9,12-octadecadienoic acid.  Period.  No delta in front of the
9,12 and no alternative omega scheme.  As a point of comparison, linolenic
acid (three double carbon bonds) is 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid.  Now,
if one wanted to be a IUPAC purist, one would merely write these fatty acids
as cis,cis-9,12-octadecadienoic acid or cis,cis,cis-9,12,15-octadecatrienoic
acid.

	What could be *simpler*?

<> Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. - Uniquex Corp. - Viatran Corp.
<> UUCP  {allegra|boulder|decvax|rutgers|watmath}!sunybcs!kitty!larry
<> TEL 716/688-1231 | 716/773-1700  {hplabs|utzoo|uunet}!/      \uniquex!larry
<> FAX 716/741-9635 | 716/773-2488      "Have you hugged your cat today?"