🚀 go-pugleaf

On 1997-09-20 snmjohnson@iclub.org said:
   >Newsgroups: sci.chem,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,ab.
   >general,atl.general,aus.education,aus.electronics,aus.general,b
   >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
   >--------------6951B622AC3128E6E9073EC9
   >tomitire@vegas.infi.net wrote:
   >> On 1997-09-19 ewag@usa.net said:

   >>    >>ed  Nuclear power is the only thing that will get the world
   >>today     >>to expand.  The  only other thing that we have that is
   >>that     >>powerful is a anti-matter machine.  But for this world
   >>to get to     >>the edge of the universe or other planets quickly
   >>is by nuclear     >energy.  It is the only thing that will
   >>generate high amounts of     >power. -- Reaper

   >> Why not simply do it slower?  If you think you can do it at all.
   >> tomitire

   >Because the public has little to no attention span or memory to
   >speak of, and it is them (the public) who must fund such projects
   >as space exploration.  

Must? That remains to be seen.

    If NASA would have said: "Give us a cool
   >million today so we can send a probe to Mars in five or ten
   >years" there would have never been a Mars Mission.  As it
   >was, the only way funding got through was by the "Life on
   >Mars" pseudo-hysteria.

Well, an honest scientific viewpoint.  This is the point behind
my wishing to see those people speak about their projects under
oath.

People are catching up with their scams.  

tomitire