🚀 go-pugleaf

amanda panda, who said she was never going to respond to me again,
wrote:

> bob <thanatos@coldmail.nu> wroteL
> > On 29 Nov 2003 14:49:31 -0800, amanda panda wrote:
> > 
> > >thanatos@coldmail.nu (bob) wrote:
> > >> amanda panda wrote:
> > >> > thanatos@coldmail.nu (bob) wrote:
> > >> > > amanda wrote some more stuff. I'd include it but ...
> > >> > 
> > >> >  Include it bobbee boy, instead of lying. 
> > >> 
> > >> Context, slow one, context.  I was referring to the fact that I didn't
> > >> include any of the words you had written in your recent post.
> > >> 
> > >
> > >Then, no need to display my email account. Do you even understand your
> > >own context.
> > 
> > You don't make much sense.
> 
>   What was your intention was displaying my email address to the ngs
> groups I never knew existed?  It couldn't be good.

My newsreader does that automatically. If you'd like me to remove your
email address when I flame you I will. Just ask! That covers my
intentions (or lack thereof) regarding your email address. My choice
of newsgroups:

alt.personals.aliens - I chose this because ... heh .. you should be
able to figure it out

ba.forsale - you live in the SF Bay area, right?

alt.thanatos - I've been neglecting the group for years

I don't recall copying alt.angst. You seem to have taken your bobee
crusade there.

alt.romance - seemed fitting. You are looking for love, aren't you?

> > >It is obvious that you are too bored, not to mention too childish.
> > >Good grief..you don't have to be this way, you know? You can make
> > >friends instead of making enemies.
> > 
> > heh

> Who knows how many other you have picked on?

The Shadow knows.

> And I am letting you off easily too, and you know it. 

Amanda Amanda Amanda.

> This is it. I am really p***ed off 

That's a bummer. Take a few deep breaths.

> but I haven't considered you to be as low as hanson
> and the other one .. so far.

Which other one?
> 
> This is it. No more response from me.

I remember reading a similar statement yesterday.