🚀 go-pugleaf

bob <thanatos@coldmail.nu> wrote in message news:<q99qsvgti5lgu5bhmhjm3imkqnsb0iftbd@4ax.com>...
> On 1 Dec 2003 21:17:32 -0800, amanda94621@yahoo.com (amanda) wrote:
> 
> >thanatos@coldmail.nu (bob) wrote in message news:<a9962032.0312011318.91014ed@posting.google.com>...
> >> amanda panda, who said she was never going to respond to me again,
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > bob <thanatos@coldmail.nu> wroteL
> >> > > On 29 Nov 2003 14:49:31 -0800, amanda panda wrote:
> >> > > 
> >> > > >thanatos@coldmail.nu (bob) wrote:
> >> > > >> amanda panda wrote:
> >> > > >> > thanatos@coldmail.nu (bob) wrote:
> >> > > >> > > amanda wrote some more stuff. I'd include it but ...
> >> > > >> > 
> >> > > >> >  Include it bobbee boy, instead of lying. 
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> Context, slow one, context.  I was referring to the fact that I didn't
> >> > > >> include any of the words you had written in your recent post.
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Then, no need to display my email account. Do you even understand your
> >> > > >own context.
> >> > > 
> >> > > You don't make much sense.
> >> > 
> >> >   What was your intention was displaying my email address to the ngs
> >> > groups I never knew existed?  It couldn't be good.
> >> 
> >> My newsreader does that automatically. If you'd like me to remove your
> >> email address when I flame you I will. Just ask! That covers my
> >> intentions (or lack thereof) regarding your email address. 
> >
> > What's the point of asking you to remove when you already initiated
> >the flame in those ngs too. 
> 
> If you'd like, I will have google purge the posts from their database.
> It might take me a while to get around to it but I will do it if you
> ask. I always do this if asked and I don't even expect wild sex though
> ... it'd be appreciated. 

>Are you cute?

Not as cute as hanson.

> 
> >Have you ever seen my posts in those
> >groups for you to flame me in those groups? May eeb 
> 
> Do you talk like this?
 Why not? 

> 
> >there was one to
> >Ilya's post long time ago, when I stumbled in there.  Not that I read
> >any more lines from his post than up to where I cut it off to say what
> >I said.
> >
> >BTW, I agree with you on your comment to hanson, saying that Ilya
> >would have sent him an email if he were a female. I am sure you knwow
> >why I agree.
> 
> I'm not sure I know.

 He sent me the link to the photographs taken byone of his female
friends - they were very nice - and also the link to his website, for
poems. He rpobaby assume that I would love photography. (At the time,
I didn't know who he was and didn't bother to click on the links he
usually gives in his posts). So I asked him what ethnic name "Shambat"
was and he told me that it's Russian. I did know that Russians love
poetry like no one does.

>Ilya is an OK guy deep down where it counts. If I
> needed his ear he'd be there for me. I hose on him without mercy but I
> respect him more than most people I know.

Good. 

He informed me via a post that you are like that to everyone (he was
referring to your flaming me.)

> 
> >> alt.thanatos - I've been neglecting the group for years
> > 
> >Years or days? Too much suger from pecan pie blurring your thinking? 
> 
> Years. 

Lier!

>It was a fairly active group until I chased away a bunch of the
> charter posters several years ago.

That confirmed what Ilya said. You sure are good at making enemies.

>  
> >> I don't recall copying alt.angst. You seem to have taken your bobee
> >> crusade there.
> >> 
> >> alt.romance - seemed fitting. You are looking for love, aren't you?
> >
> > What are you smoking now?   You were the one who included alt.romance
> >when you initiated the thread.
> 
> Yes, and?
> 
> >It's OK to look for love even when you are already married.  Extra
> >love is not going to harm you.
> 
> Are you married?
 
 Next question, please.

> >> > This is it. I am really p***ed off 
> >> 
> >> That's a bummer. Take a few deep breaths.
> > 
> >It seems you have picked up some breathing meditation. Good for you. 
> 
> I went through my "new age" period the latter half of the summer of
> '81. "must have been the roses"

 No comment on that. Growing up in a Bhuddist country of SE Asia, I
had enough exposure to that nonsense and seemed to have not needed
*the new age* thing.

> 
> >> > This is it. No more response from me.
> >> 
> >> I remember reading a similar statement yesterday.
> > 
> > It became very entertaining since yesterday, and more so today, to
> >watch hanson and you getting defensive. *That* poem really helped.
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean. You seem to be confusing explaining
> certain things to you (that we probably both feel shouldn't be
> required) with being defensive.

 I'm not sure what you mean either.  Don't worry about explaining to
me though because I have become really bored with all this stuff now.