Article View: sci.chem
Article #2206Re: UV-Vis spec recommendations
From: Josh Halpern
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 03:41
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 03:41
46 lines
2641 bytes
2641 bytes
Chuck Szmanda wrote: >A relatively low cost very compact spectrometer can be bought from Ocean >Optics. > > I'll second that. Universities also have access to an interesting "trade in" plan for their low end instruments http://www.oceanoptics.com/products/tradeineducation.asp. You can get a big discount by sending them your Ultrospec II. josh halpern > >"Louis Hom" <lhom@OCF.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message >news:c9nm9p$2lji$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > > >>Our lab is in need of a new UV-Vis spec and I was wondering if there's a >>model/brand that folks might recommend (or advise against, for that >>matter). We need decent quality for not too much money, mostly just basic >>absorbance readings and obtaining spectra. Very infrequent kinetics work. >>If we need to plug into an old laptop/PC for some functions, that can >>probably be arranged too. Our current instrument (an LKB Ultrospec II >>from the '80s) has a carousel in it, but I don't think anyone ever uses >>that feature. Similarly, a split beam might be handy, but would rarely >>find use. Any suggestions would be welcome. >>-- >> >> >> >____________________________________________________________________________ >__ > > >>Lou Hom >K'93 >>lhom@ocf.berkeley.edu >>http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~lhom/ >> >> > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<_bSvc.16010$x9.15444@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nwrddc02.gnilink.net.POSTED!610e1eb7!not-for-mailReferences:
<c9nm9p$2lji$1@agate.berkeley.edu> <u8Rvc.37046$zO3.8344@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4886,c41deddb48e07b60 X-Google-Thread: 105a11,c41deddb48e07b60 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4886,gid105a11,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nwrddc02.gnilink.net.POSTED!610e1eb7!not-for-mail From: Josh Halpern <j.halpern@incoming.verizon.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.chem,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts Subject: Re: UV-Vis spec recommendations References: <c9nm9p$2lji$1@agate.berkeley.edu> <u8Rvc.37046$zO3.8344@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <u8Rvc.37046$zO3.8344@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 47 Message-ID: <_bSvc.16010$x9.15444@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 03:41:46 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.156.20.246 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrddc02.gnilink.net 1086320506 141.156.20.246 (Thu, 03 Jun 2004 23:41:46 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 23:41:46 EDT