🚀 go-pugleaf

take it elsewhere - please.

hamdell_ruston@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

> Some excellent points were made in this essay:
>
> "To whoever is engaged in these anonymous attacks against Dr. Kukucka,
> you make yourselves look like the Taliban who constantly move from
> hideout to hideout while attacking US soldiers in Afghanistan. You
> also sound like henchmen doing Shimadzu's dirty work. Does Shimadzu
> employ you? It makes me wonder. Shimadzu wouldn't be the first nor
> last corporation to engage in such disgusting work if true. You need
> to cut your nails and ask yourselves some basic questions: 1) are
> these anonymous attacks helping your cause, 2) are these anonymous
> attacks helping Shimadzu's bottom line, 3) is your anonymity a
> guaranteed thing? I think "not" to all three questions. The FBI always
> find those kids calling in bomb threats to their local schools.
> Somebody, with little effort, could find your smelly asses too. I
> wouldn't buy anything from Shimadzu knowing what I now know
> particularly after considering the ruthless ways you (and maybe
> Shimadzu) have trashed someone anonymously. If you had any spines, you
> wouldn't be hiding like the Taliban behind rocks along the
> mountainside. The mere fact that some of your writings mention trying
> to get Dr. Kukucka fired while also trying to deny future employment
> speaks volumes. There is no doubt in my mind that a court would reward
> substantial punitive damages to Dr. Kukucka just like the courts are
> doing where Dr. Steven J. Hatfill's reputation is concerned. Which
> office does Dr. Kukucka go to to get his reputation back? A fair
> question I think. A Medline search indicates that Dr. Kukucka is well
> published distinguished scientist. He didn't become a scientist, with
> no less than two doctoral degrees I might add, by chance. You call him
> a lunatic but what do you think it makes yourselves look like when you
> respond to his supposed posts? I gotta tell you that you look more
> luny than he does when responding to a so-called lunatic. And I don't
> believe for a second that he would waste his time giving you the time
> of day. He surely has better things to do, and so should yourselves,
> unless you really are certifiable lunatics who have nothing better to
> do than to attack relentlessly like employed corporate bullies while
> scurrying to cover your cowardly tracks. None of you have ever
> presented a shread of evidence that Dr. Kukucka is responsible for any
> of this monkey business concerning Shimadzu. It's poppycock that
> you've concocted in your feeble minds and authored anonymously. And
> then you quote this luny crap in future posts thinking it's now part
> of the scientific method. It's not. What does it say about Shimadzu
> that they advertise on Craigslist.com to find a Mass Spec scientist? I
> would expect to find a call girl on Craigslist before I'd ever find a
> scientist. Besides, I'd have to wonder about Shimadzu a lot if they
> did hire someone from Craigslist. And to you who claim to have or use
> Shimadzu instrumentation, please share your peer-reviewed papers with
> all of us. Dr. Kukucka seems to have already done that. And many from
> around the world have quoted his research in their own works. Now it's
> your turn. And I'm not talking about another cowardly attack from the
> henchmen who are masquerading like terrorists in this newsgroup."
>
> This essay reminds me of the Japanese Rape of Nanking: http://www.tribo.org/nanking
>
> Please note that Shimadzu was founded in 1876 so they were around for
> World War II including 1937 and 1938 when this terrible tragedy
> occurred:
>
> "The Rape of Nanking: An Undeniable History in Photographs tells the
> story in words and more than 400 photographs of the Japanese invasion
> of China and the sacking of its capital city, Nanking, in 1937-38.
> Between December 1937 and March 1938 at least 369,366 Chinese
> civilians and prisoners of war were slaughtered by the invading
> troops. An estimated 80,000 women and girls were raped; many of them
> were then mutilated or murdered."
>
> Shimadzu's own published company history (prior to them scrubbing it)
> has a gapping void from 1934 to 1947. It has already been noted
> previously that:
>
> "In reviewing the historical highlights of Shimadzu, there is a
> gapping void in the company timeline from 1936 (when aircraft
> equipment manufacturing started at Shimadzu) to 1947 according to
> published corporate archives. One has to wonder what was going on in
> Japan at Shimadzu during this bellicose period of 11 years? Did any of
> Shimadzu's aircraft equipment or technology find its way into Japanese
> aircraft or aircraft carriers which were used to wage a surprise
> attack on the United States at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941?"
>
> There appears to be strong evidence that Shimadzu also played a role
> in the Japanese Rape of Nanking. And as witnessed in this newsgroup,
> Shimadzu employs their paid henchmen to do their dirty work (eg.
> harass, blame, defame) when someone has the audacity to Shimadzu's
> faulty and defective instrumentation. I wonder when we'll learn that
> Shimadzu has it's henchmen (Koichi Tanaka, Terry L. Adams, Mark
> Thorson, M. A. Sonjariv, Sam Adams, Sam Adamson, David Bostwick, Joel
> Polowin, Mark
> Thorsen, Don Quixote and Our Buddy George mutilating, raping and
> murdering those who dare voice their concerns about Shimadzu and their
> inferior products.
>
> Will you risk your life doing business with Shimadzu?