Re: Can I turn lead into gold ? ? ?.?

Article View: sci.chem

Article #2494

#2494

From: Ragnarok
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:40

4 lines
1051 bytes

The fact that they chose a metal that is so close (in atomic weight)
to gold is a strange coincidence.
  I would suggest a nuclear reactor. Unfortunately, the separation
costs are too high.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6680570d.0411190440.211e8fcd@posting.google.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!not-for-mail

References: <e1cc8b8.0411181925.2409e84@posting.google.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f4886,d0b31c279fa830d0
X-Google-Thread: fa21f,d0b31c279fa830d0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4886,gidfa21f,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!not-for-mail
From: lsct2004@yahoo.com (Ragnarok)
Newsgroups: sci.chem,can.sun-stroke
Subject: Re: Can I turn lead into gold ? ? ?.?
Date: 19 Nov 2004 04:40:14 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <6680570d.0411190440.211e8fcd@posting.google.com>
References: <e1cc8b8.0411181925.2409e84@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.208.155.125
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1100868015 11125 127.0.0.1 (19 Nov 2004 12:40:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:40:15 +0000 (UTC)

Reply to Parent Message