🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:21:55 -0700, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N:
dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> etched in cyberspace:

>Dear Octa Ex:
>
>"Octa Ex" <xxx@xxx.xx> wrote in message 
>news:432a19fc.2065574015@152.91.10.200...
>
>... neglecting Hawking radiation.

Perhaps there is a size limit where the formation of appropriate
particles becomes too improbable to continue the decay.  The decay
could get stuck.
For example coult the BH+ emit an e+ and leave a neutral BH in place?
As the BH lightens up its circumference would be proportionally
smaller making an interaction less likely with the hawking radiation. 
>
>> The mass would be much greater than protons though.
>
>Why?  Couldn't the BH have the mass of exactly one proton?
Yes I was wondering if protons were BH with a + charge and similarly
electons a BH with a negative charge.  But they have too many other
properties.

>
>>  So it could
>> behave as a high density hydrogen.  There would be slight 
>> shifts in
>> the chemical properties due to the high mass of the "nucleus" .
>
>"Slight"?  Tritium is significantly different in behavior.
the heavy BH+e- "atom" could be like a superheavy tritium.  Slow
reactions, higher boiling, as well as high density.
The change in chemical properties would not be a result of space
curvature or time dilation,  but nulear mass.
>
>Note that an electron and a positron form positronium, which 
>could look like *very* light hydrogen.  But isn't.
>
>David A. Smith 
>
>
or you could do an electron and a meson.
or a meson and a nucleus.


X X
 X
X X