Article View: sci.cognitive
Article #252Re: Theories of meaning
From: Michael Zeleny
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 04:46
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 04:46
49 lines
3086 bytes
3086 bytes
In article <Nov12.191633.76256@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> peterson@CS.ColoState.EDU (james peterson) writes: >In article <1992Nov11.232151.17295@midway.uchicago.edu> >gal2@midway.uchicago.edu writes: >>This is speculation, but I think that pragmatic theory is so fuzzy and >>hand-wavy in comparison simply because (so far (as I know)) we have >>not even managed to analyze situations / contexts into neat isolated >>atomic concepts that we can name with symbols. I believe the same is >>true to a lesser extent for semantic theory. JP: >It seems to me a suspicious, if not fallacious, assumption that context >can be reduced to context-free elements. I don't see this kind of "analysis" >going anywhere. Three cheers for the Firthian remark! Having expressed my wholehearted appreciation of James' point, I shall assume my habitual part of the _advocatus diaboli_. The situation indicates a systematic ambiguity implicit in our notion of context. On one hand, there is the semantic conception of context as the concept space mutually accessible to the parties in communication; on the other hand, there is the underlying reality contingently represented by the same concepts. The question seems to depend on the nature of the relation obtaining between the two. Intuitively, it seems to me that communication ought to be logically possible quite regardless of the mundane substratum which realizes the abstract primitives of our language. (Others, e.g. Quinean behaviorists, would surely disagree...) An important exception to this intuition may be exemplified by the role of exophoric, or ostensive factors in linguistic communication. There is an amusing paper by John Lyons, "Deixis as the source of reference", published in the Keenan-edited volume, _Formal Semantics of Natural Language_, and essentially recapitulated in the second volume of his _Semantics_. On the more philosophical side of things, I recommend the work of David Kaplan and Gareth Evans. Read it, and draw your own conclusions. >Just a thought...... > >-- >james lee peterson peterson@CS.ColoState.edu >dept. of computer science >colorado state university "Some ignorance is invincible." >ft. collins, colorado (voice:303/491-7137; fax:303/491-6639) cordially, mikhail zeleny@husc.harvard.edu " -- I shall speak bluntly, because life is short."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov12.234612.17398@husc3.harvard.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc10.harvard.edu!zelenyReferences:
<agnar.aamodt-101192192202@129.241.164.107> <1992Nov11.232151.17295@midway.uchicago.edu> <Nov12.191633.76256@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc10.harvard.edu!zeleny From: zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) Newsgroups: sci.cognitive,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.lang Subject: Re: Theories of meaning Message-ID: <1992Nov12.234612.17398@husc3.harvard.edu> Date: 13 Nov 92 04:46:10 GMT Article-I.D.: husc3.1992Nov12.234612.17398 References: <agnar.aamodt-101192192202@129.241.164.107> <1992Nov11.232151.17295@midway.uchicago.edu> <Nov12.191633.76256@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> Organization: The Phallogocentric Cabal Lines: 49 Nntp-Posting-Host: husc10.harvard.edu