Re: Theories of meaning

Article View: sci.cognitive

Article #330

#330

From: David Pautler
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:40

8 lines
882 bytes

In article <erwin.722217539@trwacs>, erwin@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Harry Erwin) writes:
> Unfortunately, the brain doesn't operate that way. Two statements are
> considered equivalent if their processing generates the same activation in
> the cerebral cortex (or a subset thereof).

You don't have enough evidence to back up this claim.

	-dp-

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov20.164025.29552@ils.nwu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!uxa.ecn.bgu.edu!news.ils.nwu.edu!pautler

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.cognitive
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!uxa.ecn.bgu.edu!news.ils.nwu.edu!pautler
From: pautler@ils.nwu.edu (David Pautler)
Subject: Re: Theories of meaning
Message-ID: <1992Nov20.164025.29552@ils.nwu.edu>
Sender: usenet@ils.nwu.edu (Mr. usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: aristotle.ils.nwu.edu
Organization: The Institute for the Learning Sciences
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:40:25 GMT
Lines: 9