Re: Meaning (not Theory of)

Article View: sci.cognitive

Article #333

#333

From: Christopher Green
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:52

20 lines
1275 bytes

In article <DLB.92Nov19100229@fanny.wash.inmet.com> dlb@fanny.wash.inmet.com (David Barton) writes:
>
>Both assumptions of NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming --- NOT Natural
>Language Processing).
>
>If you want to start a discussion about this field, I humbly suggest
>that sci.psychology is a better place to try.  They have a regularly
>erupting flame war on NLP there.
>
Please do not discuss NLP here. It is precisely because such discussions
began taking ove sci.psychology that sci.cognitive was formed. As safe
rule is "If it has ANY clinical possibilities whatsoever, it doesn't 
belong on sci.cognitive."


-- 
Christopher D. Green                christo@psych.toronto.edu
Psychology Department               cgreen@lake.scar.utoronto.ca
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov20.195206.16655@psych.toronto.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!utcsri!psych.toronto.edu!christo

References: <1992Nov18.200717.11887@ausom.oz.au> <DLB.92Nov19100229@fanny.wash.inmet.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.cognitive
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!utcsri!psych.toronto.edu!christo
From: christo@psych.toronto.edu (Christopher Green)
Subject: Re: Meaning (not Theory of)
Message-ID: <1992Nov20.195206.16655@psych.toronto.edu>
Organization: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
References: <1992Nov18.200717.11887@ausom.oz.au> <DLB.92Nov19100229@fanny.wash.inmet.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:52:06 GMT
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message