Article View: sci.cognitive
Article #356Re: reasons why AI not able to model mind?
From: Daniel Morton
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 00:19
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 00:19
14 lines
1145 bytes
1145 bytes
You might want to look into the January 1990 issue of Scientific
American. Has an article by John Searle ( the arch-enemy of AI
researchers) and another interesting article by Paul and Patricia
Churchland which tries to prove that classical AI is not likely to give
us consious machines. If you want to search for articles on this topic keep
in mind the names Searle and Dreyfus. If an argument is about the likely
hood of AI, they are usually mentioned in some way.
--
"Awright, let's forget the bullshit and get on with the so-called art"
-- Charles Bukowski --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<By7287.78H@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!silver.ucs.indiana.edu!dmortonReferences:
<1992Nov23.221641.27167@nevada.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.cognitive Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!silver.ucs.indiana.edu!dmorton From: dmorton@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Daniel Morton) Subject: Re: reasons why AI not able to model mind? Message-ID: <By7287.78H@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: silver.ucs.indiana.edu Organization: Indiana University References: <1992Nov23.221641.27167@nevada.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 00:19:19 GMT Lines: 14