🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.cognitive
Article #445

RE: AI vs Cognitive Science vs Cognitive Psychology (long)

#445
From: eriksson
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 08:57
15 lines
1217 bytes
In article <24JAN93.19042016@skyfox>, meagher@skyfox writes:
|>	I don't want to argue for the long-term distinguishability of 
|>cog. sci., cog. psyche, and cog. neuro, however I do think that presently
|>there are some distinguishing features of these areas that arise for
|>reasons having to do with "stabalizing" factors inherent in science.  
|>refers to self-authenticating techniques that "harmonize" data, theory, and
|>methods (for more, see recent writings by Hacking).  

Could you give references to the articles/books (Hacking's) you're referring
to?

Jan Eriksson
Digital Equipment
Geneva,Switzerland
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan25.085716.7194@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!pa.dec.com!engage.pko.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!gvaadg.enet.dec.com!eriksson
References: <C1BDyn.4vB@cs.bham.ac.uk> <24JAN93.19042016@skyfox>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!pa.dec.com!engage.pko.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!gvaadg.enet.dec.com!eriksson
From: eriksson@gvaadg.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: sci.cognitive,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: RE: AI vs Cognitive Science vs Cognitive Psychology (long)
Message-ID: <1993Jan25.085716.7194@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
Date: 25 Jan 93 08:57:16 GMT
References: <C1BDyn.4vB@cs.bham.ac.uk> <24JAN93.19042016@skyfox>
Sender: eriksson@gvaadg.enet.dec.com (This is not a personal name)
Reply-To: eriksson@gvaadg.enet.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 15