🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1021

Re: pgp2.0 - what is an appropriate key length?

#1021
From: Charles Hannum
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 10:56
16 lines
1198 bytes
In article <1422@eouk9.eoe.co.uk> ahaley@eoe.co.uk (Andrew Haley)
writes:
>
> On the other hand, AFAIK PGP only uses a 128 bit hash to protect its
> key certificates, so an attack on the hash function would be easier
> than attacking the modulus.  Am I wrong about PGP in this respect?
> Does PGP use some extra method to protect its certificates?

The signature is also encrypted with the signer's secret key.  Thus,
you'd need to attack the modulus anyway.

--
 \  /   Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
 /\ \   PGP public key available on request.
Scheme  White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <MYCROFT.92Sep28055611@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!mycroft
References: <1992Sep23.043312.4602@colnet.cmhnet.org> <1422@eouk9.eoe.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security,alt.security.pgp
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!mycroft
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Subject: Re: pgp2.0 - what is an appropriate key length?
In-Reply-To: ahaley@eoe.co.uk's message of 28 Sep 92 08:59:58 GMT
Message-ID: <MYCROFT.92Sep28055611@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu
Organization: MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
References: <1992Sep23.043312.4602@colnet.cmhnet.org> <1422@eouk9.eoe.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 10:56:11 GMT
Lines: 16