Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1103== No Subject ==
From: Nick Barron
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 22:05
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 22:05
22 lines
1541 bytes
1541 bytes
In Message-ID: <1992Oct1.142348.14622@osf.org>, karger@osf.org writes: >The British would likely not have broken Enigma during WWII, if the Germans >had used the system in its theoretically best ways. Most of the breaks >came from bad procedures and lazy crypto operators. This reminds me of the case of the German crypto operator who only ever used two synchronising sequences - HITLER or his girlfriend's name (which I forget!). Apparently he was taken prisoner by the 8th Army, and when the crypto guys found out, the 8th had to go to *amazing* lengths to let him escape!!!! Also, in <BvGDp3.AGt@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu writes: >The Naval codes were only infrequently broken, and there was at least one >branch of the service (the SS?) whose Enigma codes were NEVER broken during >the course of the war. Well, the U-boats (and some of the other naval ops) used a machine with an extra disc. And as far as some codes that wer *never* broken, don't be too sure, as we don't have an FOIA over here (UK). My father knew one of the Bletchley park people and only found out 3 years ago that he was involved!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<memo.676563@cix.compulink.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!nikbShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!nikb From: nikb@cix.compulink.co.uk (Nick Barron) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: == No Subject == Message-ID: <memo.676563@cix.compulink.co.uk> Date: 11 Oct 92 22:05:54 GMT Sender: usenet@gate.demon.co.uk Reply-To: nikb@cix.compulink.co.uk Lines: 22