Re: Registered Keys - why the need? - Article 1119 - go-pugleaf

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #1119

Re: Registered Keys - why the need?

#1119

From: David Sternlight
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 22:11

10 lines
870 bytes

The discussion of multiple content messages is somewhat silly. The
government, if it were to register keys, would be pretty stupid not
to ask for the keys in advance. It's impossible to develop a
multiple content message until you know what the "real" message
is intended to be.

-- 
David Sternlight
(pgp 2.0 and ripem public keys available on request)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov5.221104.29655@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!strnlght

References: <1992Nov01.233637.138278@watson.ibm.com> <1992Nov2.084229.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu> <1992Nov4.201552.3640@chpc.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!strnlght
From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight)
Subject: Re: Registered Keys - why the need?
Message-ID: <1992Nov5.221104.29655@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
References: <1992Nov01.233637.138278@watson.ibm.com> <1992Nov2.084229.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu> <1992Nov4.201552.3640@chpc.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 22:11:04 GMT
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message