Article View: sci.crypt
Article #115Re: Is FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) still safe?
From: Ken Pizzini
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 21:02
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 21:02
23 lines
1388 bytes
1388 bytes
In article <92302.153813K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET> <K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET> writes: >The ciphers are DES, FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) and IPES (if it is still >called IPES, there are rumours Prof. Massey changes the name each week). I'm pretty sure that IPES is know as IDEA these days. >I wonder if FEAL-8 (by NTT, Japan) is still considered safe. No. In [1] it is mentioned that Differential Cryptanalysis can break Feal-8 with less than 2000 cipher texts in a chosen plaintext attack. Also [2] demonstrates a known plaintext attack on Feal-4 and Feal-6 which use about 1000 and 2000 (respectively) plaintext blocks, which suggests that Feal-8 might be vulnerable to known plaintext attacks also. [1] E. Biham, A. Shamir, "Differentia Cryptanalysys of DES-like Cryptosystesm", Proceedings of Crypto'90 [2] A. Tardy-Corfdir, H. Gilbert, "A Known Plaintext attack of Feal-4 and Feal-6", Proceedings of Crypto'91 --Ken Pizzini
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct28.210207.27232@nwnexus.WA.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mdisea!uw-coco!nwnexus!kenReferences:
<92302.153813K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mdisea!uw-coco!nwnexus!ken From: ken@halcyon.com (Ken Pizzini) Subject: Re: Is FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) still safe? Message-ID: <1992Oct28.210207.27232@nwnexus.WA.COM> Summary: No. Sender: sso@nwnexus.WA.COM (System Security Officer) Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505 References: <92302.153813K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 21:02:07 GMT Lines: 23