🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.crypt
Article #115

Re: Is FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) still safe?

#115
From: Ken Pizzini
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 21:02
23 lines
1388 bytes
In article <92302.153813K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET> <K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET> writes:
>The ciphers are DES, FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) and IPES (if it is still
>called IPES, there are rumours Prof. Massey changes the name each week).

I'm pretty sure that IPES is know as IDEA these days.


>I wonder if FEAL-8 (by NTT, Japan) is still considered safe.

No.  In [1] it is mentioned that Differential Cryptanalysis can
break Feal-8 with less than 2000 cipher texts in a chosen plaintext
attack.  Also [2] demonstrates a known plaintext attack on Feal-4
and Feal-6 which use about 1000 and 2000 (respectively) plaintext
blocks, which suggests that Feal-8 might be vulnerable to known
plaintext attacks also.

[1] E. Biham, A. Shamir, "Differentia Cryptanalysys of DES-like
	Cryptosystesm", Proceedings of Crypto'90
[2] A. Tardy-Corfdir, H. Gilbert, "A Known Plaintext attack of
	Feal-4 and Feal-6", Proceedings of Crypto'91


		--Ken Pizzini
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Oct28.210207.27232@nwnexus.WA.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mdisea!uw-coco!nwnexus!ken
References: <92302.153813K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mdisea!uw-coco!nwnexus!ken
From: ken@halcyon.com (Ken Pizzini)
Subject: Re: Is FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) still safe?
Message-ID: <1992Oct28.210207.27232@nwnexus.WA.COM>
Summary: No.
Sender: sso@nwnexus.WA.COM (System Security Officer)
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
References: <92302.153813K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 21:02:07 GMT
Lines: 23