🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1204

Re: public key interception and translation, etc.

#1204
From: Carl Ellison
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 21:25
17 lines
1411 bytes
In article <1992Oct1.142348.14622@osf.org> karger@osf.org (Paul A. Karger) writes:
>
>While in many cases, it is possible to detect the fact that
>all communications are being trapped, that is not the case if
>the computer in question is being used in a dedicated applications
>environment with non-computer-literate users or worse still in an
>isolated location with no on-site operators, but only a security guard 
>at the door.
>

I agree that it's possible to isolate a single machine and spoof it --
although even that smacks of Mission Impossible -- but that's not what was
being claimed in the postings which bothered me.  It was claimed that a
human who is trying to disseminate his own public key can be totally
isolated, even if he's aware of that possible attack so that it doesn't pay
for him to try to send out a key.  It is against that kind of nonsense that
I was arguing.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6933@transfer.stratus.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!samsung!transfer!ellisun.sw.stratus.com!cme
References: <6880@transfer.stratus.com> <1992Oct1.142348.14622@osf.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!samsung!transfer!ellisun.sw.stratus.com!cme
From: cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: public key interception and translation, etc.
Message-ID: <6933@transfer.stratus.com>
Date: 1 Oct 92 21:25:37 GMT
References: <6880@transfer.stratus.com> <1992Oct1.142348.14622@osf.org>
Sender: usenet@transfer.stratus.com
Organization: Stratus Computer, Software Engineering
Lines: 17