Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1252Re: PGP20 - Hacked???
From: Craig Presson
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 21:00
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 21:00
16 lines
1228 bytes
1228 bytes
In article <92275.10211134AEJ7D@CMUVM.BITNET> 34AEJ7D@CMUVM.BITNET writes: So far any version of PGP20 I have run across, by whatever transmission or encoding method, has contained mostly corrupted files. The only files not failing the CRC checks were PGP.EXE and the first of the documentation files. I'm suspicious - this looks like Someone is circulating a rather crudely hacked version of the program. Or am I being overly paranoid? W. K. Gorman No, you are being just-about-right paranoid, but I'll bet if you get PKUNZIP release 1.10 instead of whatever you've used to date, you'll find it works better. I had the above problem with PKUNZIP 1.01. -- Craig Presson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct2.210018.5638@b11.b11.ingr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infonode!ingr!b11!craig!craigReferences:
<92275.10211134AEJ7D@CMUVM.BITNET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infonode!ingr!b11!craig!craig From: craig@jido.b11.ingr.com (Craig Presson) Subject: Re: PGP20 - Hacked??? In-Reply-To: 34AEJ7D@CMUVM.BITNET's message of 1 Oct 92 14: 21:11 GMT Message-ID: <1992Oct2.210018.5638@b11.b11.ingr.com> Sender: usenet@b11.b11.ingr.com (Usenet Network) Reply-To: craig@jido.b11.ingr.com Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, Alabama References: <92275.10211134AEJ7D@CMUVM.BITNET> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 21:00:18 GMT Lines: 16