Article View: sci.crypt
Article #126Re: A Trial Balloon on Registered Keys
From: Gene Baxter
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 18:54
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 18:54
50 lines
2658 bytes
2658 bytes
In article <1ckeg2INNnl1@function.mps.ohio-state.edu>, fiedorow@function.mps.ohio-state.edu (Zbigniew Fiedorowicz) writes: [...] | Professor Denning's proposals for encryption key registration | have inspired me to advance my own ideas for hastening the | onset of a brave new world (lamentably already 8 years overdue). | Why not install video cameras in every home? They could be tied | into existing cable television systems.... | The benefits of such a proposal are obvious and indisputable. | Heinous criminal activity will be strongly discouraged. Family | values will be improved. The national moral fiber will be | enhanced. | | Tongue firmly in cheek, Then -- Jerry Replies: >Mr. Fiedorowicz's tongue may have been in his cheak, but he has presented a >wonderful illustration of why, in legal reasoning, reductio ad absurdum >arguments carry almost no weight. What I believe Mr. Fiedorwicz's meaning here is not "reductio ad absurdum"; BUT more how absurd the whole idea of having "authority" or goverment keeping tabs on crypto keys. I mean really; what would I be doing if I submitted my key to an authorised source that would keep it secret until I did something that society didn't approve of. Then my goose would be cooked right? I'm sorry but I really won't be participating in any such activities. I will still send my crypto-messages and codes without any supervision. I think that most people that feel that the rights of the individual are priority #1. As long as they don't infringe upon other peoples rights. SO the questions I put is: 1. Does the fact that a person is using some form of cryptology make them suspect? 2. Does the federal goverment really think that their bureaucracy can keep up with technology? 3. If a person is really doing illegal activites that use cryptography wouldn't it(the activity) show other aspects that were also illegal? =============================== Gene Baxter... "Show me your crypto-key and I'll tell you no lies" ===============================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct28.185455.14475@e3u001.ped.pto.ford.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!fmsrl7!e3u001!ed0115.ped.pto.ford.com!baxterReferences:
<1992Oct27.214344.25766@tessi.com> <1ckeg2INNnl1@function.mps.ohio-state.edu> <1992Oct28.112617.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!fmsrl7!e3u001!ed0115.ped.pto.ford.com!baxter From: baxter@ed0115.ped.pto.ford.com (Gene Baxter) Subject: Re: A Trial Balloon on Registered Keys Message-ID: <1992Oct28.185455.14475@e3u001.ped.pto.ford.com> Sender: root@e3u001.ped.pto.ford.com (System PRIVILEGED Account) Organization: Powertrain Electronics, Ford Motor Co. References: <1992Oct27.214344.25766@tessi.com> <1ckeg2INNnl1@function.mps.ohio-state.edu> <1992Oct28.112617.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 18:54:55 GMT Lines: 50