🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.crypt
Article #126

Re: A Trial Balloon on Registered Keys

#126
From: Gene Baxter
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 18:54
50 lines
2658 bytes
In article <1ckeg2INNnl1@function.mps.ohio-state.edu>,
fiedorow@function.mps.ohio-state.edu (Zbigniew Fiedorowicz) writes:

[...]
|      Professor Denning's proposals for encryption key registration 
| have inspired me to advance my own ideas for hastening the
| onset of a brave new world (lamentably already 8 years overdue).
|      Why not install video cameras in every home?  They could be tied
| into existing cable television systems....
|      The benefits of such a proposal are obvious and indisputable.
| Heinous criminal activity will be strongly discouraged. Family
| values will be improved.  The national moral fiber will be
| enhanced.
| 
| Tongue firmly in cheek,


Then -- Jerry Replies:
>Mr. Fiedorowicz's tongue may have been in his cheak, but he has presented a
>wonderful illustration of why, in legal reasoning, reductio ad absurdum
>arguments carry almost no weight.


	What I believe Mr. Fiedorwicz's meaning here is not "reductio ad
absurdum"; BUT more how absurd the whole idea of having "authority" or
goverment keeping tabs on crypto keys.  I mean really; what would I be
doing if I submitted my key to an authorised source that would keep it
secret until I did something that society didn't approve of.  Then my
goose would be cooked right?  I'm sorry but I really won't be participating
in any such activities.  I will still send my crypto-messages and codes
without any supervision.  I think that most people that feel that the
rights of the individual are priority #1. As long as they don't infringe
upon other peoples rights.

SO the questions I put is:

1. Does the fact that a person is using some form of cryptology make them
	suspect?

2. Does the federal goverment really think that their bureaucracy can keep
	up with technology?

3. If a person is really doing illegal activites that use cryptography wouldn't
	it(the activity) show other aspects that were also illegal?


===============================
Gene Baxter...
	"Show me your crypto-key and I'll tell you no lies"
===============================
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Oct28.185455.14475@e3u001.ped.pto.ford.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!fmsrl7!e3u001!ed0115.ped.pto.ford.com!baxter
References: <1992Oct27.214344.25766@tessi.com> <1ckeg2INNnl1@function.mps.ohio-state.edu> <1992Oct28.112617.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!fmsrl7!e3u001!ed0115.ped.pto.ford.com!baxter
From: baxter@ed0115.ped.pto.ford.com (Gene Baxter)
Subject: Re: A Trial Balloon on Registered Keys
Message-ID: <1992Oct28.185455.14475@e3u001.ped.pto.ford.com>
Sender: root@e3u001.ped.pto.ford.com (System PRIVILEGED Account)
Organization: Powertrain Electronics, Ford Motor Co.
References: <1992Oct27.214344.25766@tessi.com> <1ckeg2INNnl1@function.mps.ohio-state.edu> <1992Oct28.112617.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 18:54:55 GMT
Lines: 50