Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1264Re: Registered Keys - why the need?
From: Michael T. Palmer
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 20:22
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 20:22
43 lines
3066 bytes
3066 bytes
strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes: >Those who would oppose registration because it would make it easier to >enforce laws should direct their attention to the laws, not the >registration. Otherwise they are advocating making law violation >easier. The proper place to oppose "improper" laws is in the >law-making process, and subsequently in the courts, not in the >"registration" arena, unless registration itself is, say, >unconstitutional. If it is, then the grounds for opposition are >constitutional, not that it's "been shown" (I say it hasn't) that >registration is usually a prelude to confiscation. I think the main problem many people have with registration schemes has nothing to do with enforcing *current* laws. It has to do with setting the stage for making future (undesirable) laws possible. It is easier to fight bad legislation by not giving congresscritters the inkling that something is even possible, than it is by letting them know they can increase their power and then trying to prevent them from doing it. By the way, a MAJOR HUGE difference between automobiles and guns/crypt is that driving a car on the highways of a state is a privilege, whereas bearing arms in defense of self/family/country and communicating with others privately are RIGHTS guarranteed (not granted) by our constitution. The state has an interest in registering automobiles, so that it can exercise the authority granted it by its citizens regarding vehicular rules and regulations. But the state has NO legitimite interest in registering firearms or crypto keys, since its citizens have NOT granted it the authority to interfere with exercising these rights. The legislature does not have the authority to pass laws which infringe on these rights, and if our courts were performing their duty all that crap would get thrown out. But since things don't always work as intended, some of us tend to get more PROactive than REactive. This is why the mention of firearms/crypto key registration makes people hopping mad - we know what the long term impact of letting such laws get passed will be. The government will assume powers not given it by the people. -- Michael T. Palmer, M/S 152, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681 Voice: 804-864-2044, FAX: 804-864-7793, Email: m.t.palmer@larc.nasa.gov PGP 2.0 Public Key now available -- Consider it an envelope for your e-mail
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<palmer.721081324@news.larc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.larc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!palmerReferences:
<Bx7v6J.1wD@portal.hq.videocart.com> <1992Nov5.214347.27535@netcom.com> <1992Nov6.082920.26456@genie.slhs.udel.edu> <1992Nov6.172823.1015@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.larc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!palmer From: palmer@icat.larc.nasa.gov (Michael T. Palmer) Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.org.eff.talk,alt.privacy,talk.politics.guns Subject: Re: Registered Keys - why the need? Date: 6 Nov 92 20:22:04 GMT Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA USA Lines: 43 Distribution: inet Message-ID: <palmer.721081324@news.larc.nasa.gov> References: <Bx7v6J.1wD@portal.hq.videocart.com> <1992Nov5.214347.27535@netcom.com> <1992Nov6.082920.26456@genie.slhs.udel.edu> <1992Nov6.172823.1015@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: icat.larc.nasa.gov