🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.crypt
Article #137

Re: A Trial Balloon to Ban Encryption?

#137
From: Dave Bushong
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 04:58
58 lines
2885 bytes
cjp@megatek.com (Chris "Systems Stud" Pikus) writes:

>cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison) writes:
> 
>> Don't forget the (ex-?) director of the NSA saying recently that he considers
>> good encryption to be strictly munitions -- something to be kept out of the
>> hands of the civilians.
>> 

>	Which is exactly why the people should have it; to keep the
>government honest. That is what the Second Amendment was all about. For
>the same reasons that the founding fathers wanted us to have firearms and
>munitions, they would also have wanted us to have secure cryptosystems.

>	OK, so it is a bit of a stretch. But I couldn't help but see the same
>arguments here on this thread. Requiring honest citizens to register keys.
>Criminals who will merely use unregistered keys for their work. "If crypto-
>graphy is outlawed, then only criminals will have cryptography."

>	Sorry, I don't want/intend to take this off on a tangent; just point
>out the similarities in argument and governmental intent.

>	And yes I do see a need to mount a concerted effort to prevent our
>beloved paternalistic government from legislating our privacy away. At this
>juncture, our rights are under attack like no other time in history.

>	 So -- the question now is -- what are we going to do about it?

I hear about people who say "Don't let them take away our rights," but
referring to people that were elected; and there is the constant "we-them"
regarding 'who is government and who is governed,' although I thought
it's supposed to be a 'gummint ... of ... the people' (?)

Map that onto this:  I used to spend a lot of time talking to my best
friend about how my marriage sucked.  I was told (after enough bitching
on my part), "Either do something about it, or quit bitching about it."

I hope my ex-wife is as happy as I am.

So, my point, Chris, is this:  If you have chosen to approve of
the method of selecting the government under which you are subject, 
either live with it or change it; if you have let it be selected without
your influence, you have chosen to live with it; and if you are sitting 
around as a spectator, then you should be very careful where you cast 
stones.

"Either do something about it, or quit bitching about it [keeping the
government honest]."

Only an opinion.

Regards,

Dave
-- 
Dave Bushong, Wang Laboratories, Inc.   Amateur Radio Callsign KZ1O
Project Leader, OCR products            kz1o@n0ary.#noca.ca.na
Internet: dbushong@wang.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <bwv9tu.e93@wang.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!das.wang.com!wang!dbushong
References: <7560@transfer.stratus.com> <1992Oct28.012956.256@megatek.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!das.wang.com!wang!dbushong
From: dbushong@wang.com (Dave Bushong)
Subject: Re: A Trial Balloon to Ban Encryption?
Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 92 04:58:41 GMT
Message-ID: <bwv9tu.e93@wang.com>
References: <7560@transfer.stratus.com> <1992Oct28.012956.256@megatek.com>
Lines: 58