Re: privacy

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #140

#140

From: Michael John Haertel
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 07:01

10 lines
976 bytes

In article <61391@aurs01.UUCP> wmsc@aurs01.UUCP (Collins Williams) writes:

     If the 2nd ammendment was intended to insure that the 
   citizenry be roughly as well armed as the government
   (a proposition I tend to believe),  isn't the possession
   by private citizens of small ;-) thermonuclear devices 
   justifiable?  Would your next door neighbor to have one?


Would you want your government to have one?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MIKE.92Oct28230129@pacifix.cs.uoregon.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!nntpserver!mike

References: <1992Oct27.231241.23112@shearson.com> <61391@aurs01.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!nntpserver!mike
From: mike@pacifix.cs.uoregon.edu (Michael John Haertel)
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: privacy
Message-ID: <MIKE.92Oct28230129@pacifix.cs.uoregon.edu>
Date: 29 Oct 92 07:01:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: pacifix.MIKE.92Oct28230129
References: <1992Oct27.231241.23112@shearson.com> <61391@aurs01.UUCP>
Sender: news@cs.uoregon.edu (Netnews Owner)
Organization: CS Dept, University of Oregon
Lines: 10
In-Reply-To: wmsc@aurs01.UUCP's message of 29 Oct 92 04:01:48 GMT

Reply to Parent Message