Article View: sci.crypt
Article #153Re: Registering "Assault Keys"
From: David Barton
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 13:47
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 13:47
42 lines
2771 bytes
2771 bytes
In article <unruh.720338918@physics.ubc.ca> unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh) writes: For those of us outside the USofA these analogies make us wonder whether such registration is not a good thing. If crypt really is like guns, whose only use is to kill lots of innocent people it seems, then maybe crypt were better strictly controlled. Ie, your arguement would be stronger if you limited yourself to the uses and abuses of cryptography and didn't engage in the silly American penchant for seeing yourselves oa as lone cowboys out to right wrongs no matter how many people get killed in the crossfire. Or as a hopped-up Don Quxote, flailing verbally away at imaginary strawmen? At least this image has a basis in fact, given your post. When people today cry out "Give me liberty or give me death" I'm tempted to say, fine, go away and die, only please do it quietly, and don't haul down a whole bunch of innocents with you. We "silly Americans" are very glad that Patrick Henry did not take this marvelous advice. Feh. [Note for those of you unable to see through sarcasm, I do not think that cryptography and guns have any similarity at all. I see no problem with the government trying to regulate our lives for the common good (and yes that is hard to discerne at times and that is why we have open political processes so the arguements can be advanced and experiments tried and thrown out if they don't work) I doubt greatly that any attempt to regulate cryptography in the manner suggested would work, and as such the impassioned debate sounds about as pointless as it would be against a govenment attempt to legislate pi to be 3.000] Then perhaps you can begin to see why gun control will not work, and has not worked. It takes about the same amount of effort to make dies for the production of a gun as it does to write a good encryption program, and not all that much more to make a gun from the dies than to duplicate the software. Dimwit. Dave Barton dlb@hudson.wash.inmet.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DLB.92Oct29084753@fanny.wash.inmet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bu.edu!inmet!inmet!dlbReferences:
<1992Oct28.235027.28039@netcom.com> <unruh.720338918@physics.ubc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bu.edu!inmet!inmet!dlb From: dlb@fanny.wash.inmet.com (David Barton) Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.org.eff.talk,alt.privacy,talk.politics.guns Subject: Re: Registering "Assault Keys" Message-ID: <DLB.92Oct29084753@fanny.wash.inmet.com> Date: 29 Oct 92 13:47:53 GMT References: <1992Oct28.235027.28039@netcom.com> <unruh.720338918@physics.ubc.ca> Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com Organization: Intermetrics Inc., Washington Division, USA Lines: 42 In-Reply-To: unruh@physics.ubc.ca's message of 29 Oct 92 06:08:38 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: fanny.wash